{"id":477,"date":"2020-07-27T11:30:37","date_gmt":"2020-07-27T09:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/showcase1.better-hotel.com\/?p=477"},"modified":"2020-11-19T19:03:58","modified_gmt":"2020-11-19T18:03:58","slug":"non-solicitation-clause-a-jeji-soucasna-uprava-a-vyuziti-v-cr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/2020\/07\/27\/non-solicitation-clause-a-jeji-soucasna-uprava-a-vyuziti-v-cr\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-solicitation clause a jej\u00ed sou\u010dasn\u00e1 \u00faprava a vyu\u017eit\u00ed v \u010cR"},"content":{"rendered":"

Non-solicitation agreements je institut v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 republice v\u00a0sou\u010dasn\u00e9 chv\u00edli pom\u011brn\u011b opom\u00edjen\u00fd, a to dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru zcela nepr\u00e1vem. V\u00a0n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm \u010dl\u00e1nku se proto zam\u011b\u0159\u00edme na vymezen\u00ed pojmu non-solicitation agreement, pop\u00ed\u0161eme jej\u00ed oporu v\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u011b, pozastav\u00edme se nad mo\u017enost\u00ed jej\u00edho re\u00e1ln\u00e9ho vyu\u017eit\u00ed v\u00a0prost\u0159ed\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky a v\u00a0neposledn\u00ed \u0159ad\u011b se zamysl\u00edme nad zachov\u00e1n\u00edm rovnov\u00e1hy smluvn\u00edch stran u podobn\u00fdch dolo\u017eek.<\/h3>\n

Definici samotn\u00e9ho institutu, bohu\u017eel nikde v\u00a0\u010desk\u00e9m pr\u00e1vn\u00edm \u0159\u00e1du nenalezneme. U\u017e p\u0159i samotn\u00e9m p\u0159ekladu tohoto institutu do \u010de\u0161tiny se n\u00e1m naskytne men\u0161\u00ed probl\u00e9m. Z\u0159ejm\u011b v\u0161ak bude na m\u00edst\u011b pou\u017e\u00edt p\u0159eklad ve zn\u011bn\u00ed: \u201edolo\u017eka neusilov\u00e1n\u00ed o akvizici\u201c, je\u017e byl pou\u017eit v\u00a0r\u00e1mci jednoho ze sd\u011blen\u00ed Komise.[1]<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0Pokud bychom m\u011bli poskytnout ur\u010ditou definici samotn\u00e9ho institutu, pak bychom non-solicitation\u00a0agreement ozna\u010dili jako dolo\u017eku, \u010di smlouvu, kterou se zam\u011bstnanec zavazuje zdr\u017eet se po sjednanou dobu akvizice zam\u011bstnavatelov\u00fdch zam\u011bstnanc\u016f, z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b i jeho dodavatel\u016f.<\/p>\n

\u010cesk\u00fd pr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u0159\u00e1d nezn\u00e1 v\u00a0sou\u010dasn\u00e9 dob\u011b mnoho podobn\u00fdch institut\u016f. Jako instituty ideov\u011b nejbli\u017e\u0161\u00ed m\u016f\u017eeme z\u0159ejm\u011b \u0159adit k\u00a0non-solicitation agreement konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eku[2]<\/a>\u00a0a d\u00e1le pom\u011brn\u011b \u010dasto vyu\u017e\u00edvanou dohodu o zachov\u00e1n\u00ed ml\u010denlivosti, kter\u00e1 i p\u0159es sv\u00e9 velk\u00e9 vyu\u017eit\u00ed v\u00a0praxi nen\u00ed z\u00e1konem v\u00fdslovn\u011b upravena, a je proto smlouvou inomin\u00e1tn\u00ed neboli nepojmenovanou.<\/p>\n

Z\u00a0ekonomick\u00e9ho pohledu je tento institut pom\u011brn\u011b logick\u00fd a z\u00e1rove\u0148 i praktick\u00fd. Konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eka n\u00e1m bohu\u017eel nen\u00ed schopn\u00e1 pokr\u00fdt v\u0161echny potencion\u00e1ln\u00ed situace, ve kter\u00fdch zam\u011bstnanec nabude krom\u011b o\u010dek\u00e1van\u00e9ho know-how dal\u0161\u00ed cenn\u00e9 znalosti. Takov\u00e9 znalosti budou typicky kontakty na st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed z\u00e1kazn\u00edky zam\u011bstnavatele, informace o st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edch zam\u011bstnanc\u00edch zam\u011bstnavatele a p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b kontakty na zam\u011bstnavatelovi dodavatele. Je nutn\u00e9 si uv\u011bdomit, \u017ee zam\u011bstnanec m\u00e1 v\u00a0r\u00e1mci sv\u00e9ho pracovn\u00edho pom\u011bru mo\u017enost zjistit nejenom kontaktn\u00ed \u00fadaje na v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9 osoby, ale rovn\u011b\u017e mu mohou b\u00fdt, d\u00edky jeho n\u00e1plni pr\u00e1ce, zn\u00e1my r\u016fzn\u00e9 detaily, jako nap\u0159\u00edklad ceny, za kter\u00e9 jsou klient\u016fm fakturov\u00e1ny slu\u017eby, v\u00fd\u0161e mzdy jednotliv\u00fdch zam\u011bstnanc\u016f jako\u017e i ceny za zbo\u017e\u00ed \u00fa\u010dtovan\u00e9 dodavateli. Ve\u0161ker\u00e9 tyto informace mohou b\u00fdt pro zam\u011bstnavatele nesm\u00edrn\u011b citliv\u00e9, a to p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm ve chv\u00edli, kdy se dostanou do rukou konkurence.<\/p>\n

V\u00a0sou\u010dasn\u00e9 chv\u00edli se m\u016f\u017ee zam\u011bstnavatel proti takov\u00e9mu jedn\u00e1n\u00ed br\u00e1nit pouze konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017ekou, kter\u00e1 v\u0161ak z\u00e1kaz \u201ep\u0159etahov\u00e1n\u00ed\u201c zam\u011bstnanc\u016f, z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f a ani dodavatel\u016f nijak neupravuje. Konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eka n\u00e1m pouze umo\u017enuje zav\u00e1zat zam\u011bstnance tak, aby se nejd\u00e9le po dobu 1 roku zdr\u017eel v\u00fdkonu v\u00fdd\u011ble\u010dn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti, kter\u00e1 by byla shodn\u00e1 s p\u0159edm\u011btem \u010dinnosti zam\u011bstnavatele nebo kter\u00e1 by m\u011bla v\u016f\u010di n\u011bmu sout\u011b\u017en\u00ed povahu. Za takov\u00fdto z\u00e1vazek a dobrovoln\u00e9 omezen\u00ed sv\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va podnikat n\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed pak zam\u011bstnanci pen\u011b\u017eit\u00e9 vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed ve v\u00fd\u0161i nejm\u00e9n\u011b poloviny pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9ho m\u011bs\u00ed\u010dn\u00edho v\u00fdd\u011blku.<\/p>\n

Platnost non-solicitation agreement v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 republice<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Z\u00a0v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9ho je dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee non-solicitation agreement by i v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 republice z\u0159ejm\u011b na\u0161la bez probl\u00e9m\u016f svoje uplatn\u011bn\u00ed. Bohu\u017eel, vzhledem k\u00a0naprost\u00e9 absenci pr\u00e1vn\u00edho zakotven\u00ed, je st\u00e1le z\u00e1sadn\u00ed ot\u00e1zkou, jak\u00e1 je p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e1 re\u00e1ln\u00e1 vymahatelnost takov\u00e9 dolo\u017eky, a zda by v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b soudn\u00edho sporu byla takov\u00e1 dolo\u017eka uzn\u00e1na soudem za platnou.<\/p>\n

Platnost takov\u00e9 dolo\u017eky by byla dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru posuzov\u00e1na dle jej\u00edch jednotliv\u00fdch ustanoven\u00ed. Je rovn\u011b\u017e na m\u00edst\u011b br\u00e1t z\u0159etel na \u00fapravu konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eky, nebo\u0165 lze pom\u011brn\u011b d\u016fvodn\u011b o\u010dek\u00e1vat, \u017ee by takov\u00e1 dolo\u017eka mohla b\u00fdt posuzov\u00e1na ve sv\u011btle \u00fapravy pr\u00e1v\u011b konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eky a p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 judikatury.<\/p>\n

U non-solicitation agreement bude k\u202fposouzen\u00ed hned n\u011bkolik n\u00e1le\u017eitost\u00ed. Z\u00e1kladn\u00edmi n\u00e1le\u017eitostmi budou zejm\u00e9na\u00a0d\u00e9lka doby takov\u00e9ho omezen\u00ed<\/strong>\u00a0a\u00a0rozsah mo\u017enosti sjedn\u00e1n\u00ed dan\u00e9ho omezen\u00ed<\/strong>\u00a0(tzn.: zda se omezen\u00ed t\u00fdk\u00e1 v\u0161ech zam\u011bstnanc\u016f, jenom v\u00fdslovn\u011b ur\u010den\u00fdch zam\u011bstnanc\u016f atd.).<\/p>\n

D\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdm faktorem by dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru m\u011blo rovn\u011b\u017e b\u00fdt, zda je sjedn\u00e1n\u00ed non-solicitation agreement mo\u017en\u00e9 od zam\u011bstnance\u00a0spravedliv\u011b po\u017eadovat<\/strong>\u00a0(obdobn\u011b jako v\u00a0r\u00e1mci \u00fapravy konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eky[3]<\/a>), av\u0161ak nikoliv s ohledem na povahu informac\u00ed, poznatk\u016f, znalost\u00ed pracovn\u00edch a technologick\u00fdch postup\u016f (jak je tento po\u017eadavek vymezen v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eky),\u00a0ale s<\/strong>\u202f<\/strong>ohledem na oblast podnik\u00e1n\u00ed, ve kter\u00e9 by se takov\u00e1 dolo\u017eka uplat\u0148ovala.<\/strong>\u00a0Takov\u00e1 dolo\u017eka jist\u011b m\u00e1 smysl v\u202foblastech podnik\u00e1n\u00ed, ve kter\u00fdch je p\u0159\u00edm\u00fd kontakt zam\u011bstnanc\u016f se z\u00e1kazn\u00edkem\/dodavatelem naprosto esenci\u00e1ln\u00ed (nap\u0159\u00edklad poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed slu\u017eeb, \u010di p\u0159\u00edm\u00fd prodej). K\u202ftomuto faktoru je rovn\u011b\u017e nutn\u00e9 p\u0159i\u010d\u00edst, do jak\u00e9 m\u00edry je potencion\u00e1ln\u00ed trh v dan\u00e9 oblasti uzav\u0159en\u00fd, \u010di naopak otev\u0159en\u00fd (tzn. zda na dan\u00e9m trhu figuruj\u00ed \u0159\u00e1dov\u011b jednotky z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f\/dodavatel\u016f, \u010di miliony).<\/p>\n

D\u00e1le by dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru musel soud v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b sporu zohlednit, zda z\u00edskan\u00ed zam\u011bstnanci, z\u00e1kazn\u00edci \u010di odb\u011bratel\u00e9 jsou ve spojen\u00ed se zam\u011bstnavatelem v\u202fd\u016fsledku toho, \u017ee na jejich nalezen\u00ed a n\u00e1sledn\u00e9 nav\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00ed spolupr\u00e1ce vynalo\u017eil ur\u010dit\u00fd \u010das, pen\u00edze a energii, \u010di zda je z\u00edskal bez sv\u00e9ho v\u011bt\u0161\u00edho p\u0159i\u010din\u011bn\u00ed. V\u202ftakov\u00e9 situaci by m\u011bl soud p\u0159ihl\u00e9dnout k tomu, zda vytvo\u0159en\u00fd seznam aktu\u00e1ln\u00edch z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f byl z\u00edsk\u00e1n d\u00edky mnohalet\u00e9mu \u00fasil\u00ed zam\u011bstnavatele, \u010di zda byl z\u00edsk\u00e1n nap\u0159\u00edklad z\u00a0ve\u0159ejn\u011b dostupn\u00e9ho zdroje, a takovou skute\u010dnost ve sv\u00e9m rozhodnut\u00ed n\u00e1le\u017eit\u011b reflektovat.<\/p>\n

Sou\u010dasn\u00e1 \u00faprava a sankce za poru\u0161en\u00ed<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Vzhledem k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee z\u00e1kon \u010d. 262\/2006 Sb., Z\u00e1kon\u00edk pr\u00e1ce (d\u00e1le jen \u201ez\u00e1kon\u00edk pr\u00e1ce\u201c) k\u00a0dne\u0161n\u00edmu dni \u017e\u00e1dnou zm\u00ednku o non solicitation agreement neobsahuje a \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 z\u00a0pl\u00e1novan\u00fdch novel z\u00e1kon\u00edku pr\u00e1ce s \u00fapravou tohoto institutu zat\u00edm nepo\u010d\u00edt\u00e1, je z\u0159ejm\u011b nutn\u00e9 konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eku pod\u0159adit pod \u00a7\u00a01746\u00a0odst.\u00a02\u00a0z\u00e1kona \u010d. 89\/2012 Sb. Sb., ob\u010dansk\u00fd z\u00e1kon\u00edk, obdobn\u011b jako se nyn\u00ed sjedn\u00e1v\u00e1 dohoda o zachov\u00e1n\u00ed ml\u010denlivosti. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b uzav\u0159en\u00ed takov\u00e9 dolo\u017eky mezi zam\u011bstnavatelem a zam\u011bstnancem se samoz\u0159ejm\u011b budeme muset \u0159\u00eddit p\u0159ednostn\u011b z\u00e1kon\u00edkem pr\u00e1ce.<\/p>\n

Z\u00a0hlediska re\u00e1ln\u00e9 vyu\u017eitelnosti tohoto institutu je nutn\u00e9 se pozastavit u ot\u00e1zky, jak\u00e1 by m\u011bla za poru\u0161en\u00ed takov\u00e9 dolo\u017eky n\u00e1sledovat sankce. Je pouze t\u011b\u017eko p\u0159edstaviteln\u00e9 z\u00a0hlediska soukrom\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va, aby sankce za poru\u0161en\u00ed takov\u00e9 dolo\u017eky m\u011bla za n\u00e1sledek zru\u0161en\u00ed v\u0161ech smluv a pr\u00e1vn\u00edch vztah\u016f mezi nov\u00fdm zam\u011bstnavatelem\/smluvn\u00edm partnerem a z\u00edskan\u00fdmi z\u00e1kazn\u00edky, zam\u011bstnanci a dodavateli, nato\u017e pak na takov\u00e9 zru\u0161en\u00ed navazuj\u00edc\u00ed povinnost uzav\u0159\u00edt stejn\u00fd pr\u00e1vn\u00ed vztah s\u202fb\u00fdval\u00fdm zam\u011bstnavatelem, jak jsme tomu mohli b\u00fdt v\u00a0historii sv\u011bdky. Takov\u00e1 sankce se v\u00a0dne\u0161n\u00ed dob\u011b zd\u00e1 pon\u011bkud nep\u0159edstaviteln\u00e1, a proto je t\u0159eba hled\u011bt do st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u00fapravy.<\/p>\n

Sankc\u00ed by tak pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b mohla b\u00fdt nap\u0159\u00edklad smluvn\u00ed pokuta, \u010di n\u00e1hrada vznikl\u00e9 \u00fajmy.\u00a0V\u00fd\u0161e takov\u00e9 smluvn\u00ed pokuty by pak m\u011bla b\u00fdt p\u0159im\u011b\u0159en\u00e1 povaze cel\u00e9 dolo\u017eky, trhu, na kter\u00e9m se pohybujeme atd. V\u00a0t\u00e9to souvislosti je ale nutn\u00e9 pamatovat na \u00a7364d odst.\u00a07 z\u00e1kon\u00edku pr\u00e1ce, kter\u00fd stanov\u00ed, \u017ee smluvn\u00ed pokuta sm\u00ed b\u00fdt ujedn\u00e1na, jen stanov\u00ed-li to tento z\u00e1kon. Rovn\u011b\u017e mus\u00edme zohlednit \u00a71a odst. 1 p\u00edsm. a) z\u00e1kon\u00edku pr\u00e1ce, kter\u00fd stanovuje zv\u00fd\u0161enou ochranu postaven\u00ed zam\u011bstnance.<\/p>\n

Mo\u017enost ulo\u017een\u00ed smluvn\u00ed pokuty bohu\u017eel z\u00e1kon\u00edk pr\u00e1ce stanovuje pouze u institutu konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eky. O mo\u017enosti ulo\u017een\u00ed smluvn\u00ed pokuty v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b uzav\u0159en\u00ed non solicitation agreement ml\u010d\u00ed. Mus\u00edme konstatovat, \u017ee pou\u017eit\u00ed smluvn\u00ed pokuty jako sankce za poru\u0161en\u00ed non-solicitation agreement se zam\u011bstnancem je v\u00a0sou\u010dasn\u00e9 dob\u011b nemo\u017en\u00e9, nebo\u0165 poru\u0161uje \u00a7364d odst. 7 z\u00e1kon\u00edku pr\u00e1ce.<\/p>\n

A\u010d se smluvn\u00ed pokuta jev\u00ed jako adekv\u00e1tn\u00ed sankce, sou\u010dasn\u00e1 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u00faprava n\u00e1m bohu\u017eel neumo\u017enuje jej\u00ed sjedn\u00e1n\u00ed. V\u00a0budoucnu tak bude nutn\u00e9 bu\u010f zahrnout takovou mo\u017enost p\u0159\u00edmo do z\u00e1kon\u00edku pr\u00e1ce v\u00a0r\u00e1mci \u00fapravy cel\u00e9ho institutu non-solicitation agreement, nebo n\u00e1le\u017eit\u011b upravit \u00a7364d z\u00e1kon\u00edku pr\u00e1ce.<\/p>\n

Rovnov\u00e1ha smluvn\u00ed stran<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Z\u00a0pohledu zam\u011bstnavatele je non-solicitation agreement samoz\u0159ejm\u011b v\u00fdhodn\u00fd institut. Zam\u011bstnanec z\u00edsk\u00e1 za kr\u00e1tk\u00fd \u010das a v\u00a0podstat\u011b bez v\u011bt\u0161\u00edho \u00fasil\u00ed know-how, na jeho\u017e z\u00edsk\u00e1n\u00ed vynalo\u017eil zam\u011bstnavatel mnohdy i l\u00e9ta \u010dasu, pr\u00e1ce a energie. Jist\u011b nen\u00ed spravedliv\u00e9, aby zam\u011bstnanec takov\u00e9 know-how mohl bez jak\u00e9koliv sankce ihned vyu\u017e\u00edt ve prosp\u011bch zam\u011bstnavatelovy konkurence.<\/p>\n

Jak\u00fd je ale pohled ze strany zam\u011bstnance? Je o\u010dividn\u00e9, \u017ee by pr\u00e1vn\u00ed vztah zalo\u017een\u00fd takovou dolo\u017ekou m\u011bl b\u00fdt zalo\u017een\u00fd na pomysln\u00e9 rovnov\u00e1ze mezi zam\u011bstnancem a\u00a0zam\u011bstnavatelem, jak tomu stanovil \u00fastavn\u00ed soud nap\u0159\u00edklad v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpadu konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eky.[4]<\/a>\u00a0Je ale ot\u00e1zkou, zda se v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b non-solicitiation agreement d\u00e1 hovo\u0159it o tak z\u00e1va\u017en\u00e9m z\u00e1sahu do zam\u011bstnancova pr\u00e1va na podnik\u00e1n\u00ed, jako v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eky. Pokud by se zam\u011bstnancem byla uzav\u0159enou pouze non-solicitation agreement, nen\u00ed zam\u011bstnanec nijak omezen v\u00a0mo\u017enosti d\u00e1le pracovat v\u00a0oboru a pota\u017emo se nechat zam\u011bstnat u p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9 konkurence sv\u00e9ho b\u00fdval\u00e9ho zam\u011bstnavatele. Byl by ale omezen z\u00a0hlediska z\u00e1kazu akvizice z\u00e1kazn\u00edk\u016f, zam\u011bstnanc\u016f nebo dodavatel\u016f b\u00fdval\u00e9ho zam\u011bstnavatele.<\/p>\n

Bez ohledu na to za jak velk\u00fd z\u00e1sah do zam\u011bstnancova pr\u00e1va podnikat bychom non-solicitation agreement pova\u017eovali, je z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee zam\u011bstnanec m\u00e1 v\u00a0r\u00e1mci zachov\u00e1n\u00ed rovnov\u00e1hy mezi zam\u011bstnancem a zam\u011bstnavatelem pr\u00e1vo na ur\u010dit\u00e9 protipln\u011bn\u00ed. T\u00edmto protipln\u011bn\u00edm by mohlo b\u00fdt ur\u010dit\u00e9 pen\u011b\u017eit\u00e9 vyrovn\u00e1n\u00ed po vzoru konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eky, kter\u00e9 by ale dne na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru mohlo b\u00fdt teoreticky i ni\u017e\u0161\u00edho rozsahu, tedy by mohlo b\u00fdt stanoveno pod \u010d\u00e1stku p\u0159edstavuj\u00edc\u00ed polovinu pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00e9ho m\u011bs\u00ed\u010dn\u00edho v\u00fdd\u011blku zam\u011bstnance.<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1v\u011br<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Non-solicitation agreement je dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru u\u017eite\u010dn\u00fd a zaj\u00edmav\u00fd institut, kter\u00fd by v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 republice mohl s\u00a0postupn\u00fdm n\u00e1r\u016fstem globalizace nach\u00e1zet \u010d\u00edm d\u00e1l t\u00edm v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed uplatn\u011bn\u00ed. Bohu\u017eel p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm vzhledem k\u00a0absenci jak\u00e9koliv pr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u00fapravy tohoto institutu v\u00a0\u010desk\u00e9 pr\u00e1vn\u00edm \u0159\u00e1du nen\u00ed v\u00a0praxi p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n, a to zejm\u00e9na z\u00a0d\u016fvodu nejistoty ze strany zam\u011bstnavatele. Tato nejistota se t\u00fdk\u00e1 p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm ot\u00e1zky, zda by takov\u00e1 dolo\u017eka byla soudem uzn\u00e1na jako platn\u00e1 a p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b jakou by m\u011bl zam\u011bstnavatel po\u017eadovat sankci za poru\u0161en\u00ed dolo\u017eky. Nejistot bychom nicm\u00e9n\u011b nalezli na obou stran\u00e1ch v\u00edce ne\u017e dost.<\/p>\n

Dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru je nicm\u00e9n\u011b pravd\u011bpodobn\u00e9, \u017ee stejn\u011b jako si konkuren\u010dn\u00ed dolo\u017eka na\u0161la, i bez pr\u00e1vn\u00ed opory, svoji cestu do na\u0161eho pr\u00e1vn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du, stejn\u011b tak si o svoje m\u00edsto na slunci \u010dasem \u0159ekne i non-solicitation agreement. Cesta to ale bude z\u0159ejm\u011b dlouh\u00e1 a n\u00e1m nezbude ne\u017e si po\u010dkat na p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161nou judikaturu, kter\u00e1 by mohla poskytnout zam\u011bstnavatel\u016fm i zam\u011bstnanc\u016fm dostate\u010dnou jistotu a z\u00e1rove\u0148 zajistit jist\u00fd pr\u00e1vn\u00ed r\u00e1mec dan\u00e9 \u00fapravy zaji\u0161tuj\u00edc\u00ed rovnov\u00e1hu pr\u00e1v na obou stran\u00e1ch. Takov\u00e1 judikatura by z\u00e1rove\u0148 m\u011bla b\u00fdt impulzem pro p\u0159ijet\u00ed p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u00fapravy ze strany z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce.<\/p>\n

[1]<\/a>\u00a0Sd\u011blen\u00ed Komise o omezen\u00edch p\u0159\u00edmo souvisej\u00edc\u00edch se spojov\u00e1n\u00edm a pro n\u011b nezbytn\u00fdch (2005\/C 56\/03), \u010dl. 26 a 41.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a>\u00a0\u00a7 310 a \u00a7 311 z\u00e1kona \u010d. 262\/2006 Sb., Z\u00e1kon\u00edk pr\u00e1ce.<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a>\u00a0\u00a7 310 odst. 2 z\u00e1kona \u010d. 262\/2006 Sb., Z\u00e1kon\u00edk pr\u00e1ce.<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a>\u00a0N\u00e1lez \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu ze dne 2. 5. 2019,\u00a0sp. zn. II. \u00daS 3101\/18<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Non-solicitation agreements je institut v\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 republice v\u00a0sou\u010dasn\u00e9 chv\u00edli pom\u011brn\u011b opom\u00edjen\u00fd, a to dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru zcela nepr\u00e1vem. V\u00a0n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm \u010dl\u00e1nku se proto zam\u011b\u0159\u00edme na vymezen\u00ed pojmu non-solicitation agreement, pop\u00ed\u0161eme jej\u00ed oporu v\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u011b, pozastav\u00edme se nad mo\u017enost\u00ed jej\u00edho re\u00e1ln\u00e9ho vyu\u017eit\u00ed v\u00a0prost\u0159ed\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky a v\u00a0neposledn\u00ed \u0159ad\u011b se zamysl\u00edme nad zachov\u00e1n\u00edm rovnov\u00e1hy smluvn\u00edch stran u podobn\u00fdch dolo\u017eek. Definici […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":479,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[9],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=477"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":742,"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477\/revisions\/742"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/plajner.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}